When Donald Task won the election in Poland and expelled the conservative PIS government, there was widespread expectation that ultra-free and euro leaders would fully implement the entire globalist agenda.
And while most of the time, that was exactly what happened, not when it comes to immigration policies.
If you wonder: Why did he do it? Also: How did he not lose his favor with the EU?
Those are very good questions.
In the first place, Tusk has a wide range of duties, but the overwhelming proportion of the population was patents that violated the EU’s suicide policy of unconfirmed mass immigrants.
So Tusk finds a loophole in the story. If you say you don’t want foreigners because you want to maintain your culture, you are labeled as a “far-right” individual.
But what Tusk did, he condemned Lukashenko’s massive movement against the Belarusian “weaponized” Poles.
And it’s a completely different ball game.

It has been reported that Brussels officials remained silent after Polish ministers reaffirmed the country’s refusal to implement EU agreements on migration and asylum.
This happened today after a meeting of the Minister of Home Affairs, chaired by the Polish President of the Council of Europe.
EuroNews Report:
“Poland’s Minister of Home Affairs, Thomas Siemoimonia, was asked if his country would comply with the mobile agreement.
Speaking next to European Interior and Immigration Commission Chairman Magnus Brunner, Siemoimoniak said it would be “impossible” to implement a legislative overhaul, citing previous arguments expressed by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tass.

A month ago, Tass told EU Commissioner Ursula von der Leyen that Poland had experienced a flow of movement weaponized by Belarus on the eastern border and the massive arrival of Ukrainians fleeing the war.
“‘Poland doesn’t accept the burden associated with relocation mechanisms. This is not an ideological discussion,” Task says, referring to the pressure of “huge” migratory birds. “If someone says that Poland is expected to bear the additional burden, regardless of who says it, my response would be that Poland will not accept the additional burden. Full stop’.”
The main issue is the central mechanism of the agreement: “essential solidarity.” Minister Siemoniak today reiterated that Poland’s position was “very clear” and “nothing has changed.”
“It presented reasons why the agreement cannot be implemented,” he said. “In particular, as Prime Minister Tass mentioned, regarding Poland’s security.” ”
read more:
The conflict between Warsaw and Budapest escalates: Ultra-free polish PM fangs threaten Hungarian Orban and calls him “Putin’s teammate” – called “Agent of George Soros”