In the past, more than 60 or more scholars have signed a public letter that supports this initiative. They argue that deploying this technology as a potential climate policy options will bring unacceptable risks.
radiation
Frank Biaman, a professor of the global sustainable governance of the University of Utrecht, said:
“The complete risk of the final SRM development is not known, and there is no reasonable global governance mechanism to deal with such planetary intervening technology.
“In addition, the current proposal for more SRM research has a high risk of ultimately delaying all efforts to reduce climate risk by defeating greenhouse gas emissions. ”
Royal Chemical Association Scientific evaluation shows that SAI implementation may be negative, along with various other reports and articles. resultHeat waves, drought, depletion of ozone, weather and climate patterns, etc.
The depletion of ozone in the strat cannot increase the level of UV-B radiation that reaches the surface of the earth, adversely affect human health, ocean, and land life, causing DNA damage, and increasing the risk of cancer.
Stop
The development of SAI may confuse the water cycle and affect extreme weather phenomena, such as tropical low pressure, hurricane, and an increase in the frequency of storms.
Furthermore, the potential impact is expected to be particularly severe for the most vulnerable community for climate change such as coastal and tropical areas.
SAI can pose important poses Health risk By inhaling suspension particles and intake of particles through water and food sources.
In addition, excessive cooling from volcanic eruptions, such as the effects of the development of SAI technology, causing a “summerless year”, for an event like a volcanic winter, such as a global Mount Tambola eruption in 1815. I was connected. Lack of foodAs you can see in 1816.
When SAI is implemented, there is no option to reverse the process, and it may depend on permanent. This is known as the “end shock”. If SAI is suddenly stopped, the natural climate cycle will be resumed, the temperature will rise rapidly, potentially increased 2 to 4 times higher, making it difficult to manage.
Development
CORRY emphasizes additional risks related to SG technology research, development, and development. “Geopolitical dynamics are already working and recognized. SG technology research, development, and potential developments are unlikely to be led by climate risk management alone.
“It cannot be assumed that these technologies will be deployed rationally or for purely altruistic global purposes, and are also useful for geographical interests.
“SG technology is likely to be promoted not only for climate concerns, but also due to security, control, and economics,” he added.
One of the most surprising aspects of SG is geopolitical risks and governance issues. The dominant or powerful coalition can take the initiative in the development of this technology and can immediately and have a deep harm to other areas.
Currently, there is no comprehensive multilateral governance framework to supervise SG research or development.
Weapon
Collie explained: “I do not oppose SG research or technology. Itself -However, we are not a unilateral freedom, but want a specific “governance”.
“Global in combined with coordinated multilateral research efforts, in combination with not only scientific but also the form of knowledge, in consideration of legal, ethical, and geopolitical concerns. If there is a moratorium, I support such research.
“As things happen, responsible researchers should promote responsible research and have a suspension of deployment.”
The SG Modeling Experiment excludes geopolitical and governance issues. Research article CORRY co -authored and published International research review (Ris).
Concerns about SG’s weapons, mainly the global physics of global physics, is incorrectly recognized for the geopathic “incorrectness”. It has been rejected as being very exaggerated.
Promotion
In the case of SG WeaponIt may deepen global inequality around the world and escalate conflicts. You can use it as a strategic tool for negotiations, target disputes, or even cause a new source of dispute.
We are already in political landscape that cannot reach a fair and collective agreement. In some countries, one -sided SG Initiative is regarded as a direct threat to national security, promoting retaliation behavior that can unstable international peace and security.
United Nations Environmental Council (UNEA), Global organizations in charge of making important decisions on environmental issues are composed of 193 member countries.
But the government Multi -country governance framework Both are in UNEA regarding the research and development of SG technology Fourth session March 2019 and its Sixth session March 2024.
CORRY emphasized another troublesome concern about the SG development. “Fake or propaganda about SG can be generated and spread by various stakeholders, including major great powers such as the United States, Russia, and China.
hedge
“Imagine the political tension and controversy of climate and atmosphere science.
“Furthermore, SG is due to negative weather and climate events such as drought, floods, storms, and to exacerbate the confusion in areas attacked by Asia and Africa climate as a form of atmosphere colonialism. You can.
Silicon Valley and Wall Street Million Billions, States and Private Investors, NGOs, and financial and technical institutions are supporting SG technology research. This coalition contains individuals and organizations with important relationships between companies and politics.
Notable private Fund provider SG Technologies includes the Silver Lining, a non -profit organization supported by LowerCarbon Capital, a personal fund of Bill Gates managed by Ken Caldeira and David Keith, a non -profit organization managed by innovative climate research funds (Ficer). On that board.
The Hedge Fund’s billionaire Jim Simmons and his wife, Simmons Foundation, also support SG Initiative.
experiment
Facebook co -founder Dustin Moskovitz, along with his partner Cari Tuna and Holden Karnofsky, provide funds to the SG Project’s Open Filan Solopic Project. The WILLEAM HEWLETT, the founder of Hewlett-Packard, is another investor in SG Technologies. The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), which has the connection between companies and companies such as Citibun Group, GE, McDonald’s, Shell, Tyson, and Walmart, is another famous supporter.
Other financing organizations include the Alfred P. Slone General Motors Foundation, the Pritz Car Innovation Fund, and the VK Rathmossen Foundation established by the founder of Hyatt Hotels Corporation.
Make Sunsets and ISRAELI COMPANY STARDUST SOLUTIONS, based in the United States, are actively working on SG. In 2023, without the consent of the Mexican government, a balloon filled with aerosol in Bahakarifornia, Mexico, was released on a sunset. As a result, Mexico announced that it would ban such experiments in the territory, and the law was immediately expected.
Stardust Solutions is said to have started an indoor test of a system designed to distribute reflected particles. Fund for funds Is linked to Israeli military and security sector。
Fascinating
In his research article It is published in Journal of Political EcologyKevin Surprise, a senior lecturer in Mount Hall York College’s environmental research, points out that the United States is the only country with a one -sided SG development ability in the near future.
Surprise article The Harvard Solarage Engineering Research Program (HSGRP) suggests that SAI research global leaders. It maintains the connection between WeatherHead Center for International Affairs and Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, and both have long -standing relationships with defense and information sector.
HSGRP is developing a stratumic control intake experiment (SCOPEX), the first outdoor SAI field experiment, in cooperation with Raven Aerostar, a contractor of the Ministry of Defense, which specializes in border security and monitoring.
Collie emphasized further risks related to fundamental measurements that the new US administration could choose. We propose temperature and solutions that directly target it.
Participation
“We have already seen the right -wing numbers that claim that climate change discussions are already promoted by communist or ideologists aimed at dismantling your beef, SUV, or capitalism. It is presented as a cheaper or preferred solution. “
He added as follows: “Comparing risks can enhance decisions, but choosing the future versions to be compared and the risks to be taken out is very ARBITRARY, and you need to be very careful.
“SG needs to be evaluated in connection with climate risks aimed at dealing with the climate risk. Substitute approaches such as fossil fuels and gradually abolition need to be evaluated with SG. There is.
“Comparison must include geopolitical, ethical, and social risks in addition to the risk of the environment, even if it is difficult to quantify, and from identifying the risk to the appropriate action. Participation is important throughout the process.
This author
Monica Picanini A regular contribution of Ecology And a freelance writer focusing on the environment, health, and human rights issues.
