When the Trump administration first announced a freeze on all federal funds in January, farmers across the country were pushed into uncertainty.
More than a month later, fourth-generation farmer Adam Chappell will continue to wait for the USDA and refund the $25,000 he paid from his pocket to implement conservation practices such as cover crops. The chapel was unable to prepare for the next crop until he learned the fate of the federal program to maintain small rice farms in Arkansas. Things have gotten so bad, the 45-year-old is even thinking about leaving the only job he ever knows. “I don’t know who can count on me or whether I can count on them as a whole to get it done,” Chapel said. “That’s what scares me.”
Virginia has forced a sustainable farming network to help smallholder farmers across the state shut down their businesses with the funding freeze. Brent Wills, livestock producer and program manager for the Virginia Bioagricultural Association, said nearly all of the organization’s funding comes from a frozen or revoked USDA program. The three-man team is currently in a hurry to plan an emergency.
“It’s pretty devastating,” Wills said. “The short-term impact of this is bad enough, but what about the long-term impact? We can’t even tally it now.”
In North Carolina, the beekeeping business has yet to receive $14,500 in emergency funds from the USDA after Hurricane Helen washed away 60 beehives. Anne Roel, a bee bee farm run in Florida and Massachusetts, said the frozen USDA grants have more than $45,000. This delay caused an additional $15,000 loss as production was delayed. They are also unsure of the future of the additional $100,000 grant they applied for. “We have to rethink our entire business plan,” Roel said. “I’m feeling a shell shock.”
Within the USDA, Fundraising Freeze targets two categories: grant applications that link farm activities to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, and two funding enacted under the Inflation Reduction Act. $19.5 billion It will be paid over several years. In addition to the uncertainty of the financing freeze, Tens of thousands of federal employees It was officials who manage various USDA programs who have lost their jobs in recent weeks.
Following the initial freeze, the court repeatedly ordered the administration to grant access to all funds, but the agency took a fragmented approach and announced the funds in a “tranche.” Even as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Home Office announced key chunks of fundraising, the USDA moved slowly citing the need to review the program with IRA fundraising. However, in some cases The contract has been completely terminatedincluding its relationship with the institution’s biggest investment in climate-smart agriculture ever.
In late February, the USDA announced that it was Releases $20 million To farmers who had already been granted grants – the first tranche of the agency.
That $20 million is “less than 1%” of the amount, according to Mike Lavender, policy director for the National Sustainable Agriculture Union. His team estimate The three IRA-funded programs have legally pledged around $2.3 billion through 30,715 conservation agreements for ranchers, farmers and foresters. These contracts are made through the Environmental Quality Incentive Program, the Conservation Stewardship Program, and the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. “In some respects, that’s a positive sign that some have been released,” Lavender said. “But I don’t think it’s very important, but for the majority, [this] I will never do anything. ”
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
A week later, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins announced that Congress could meet the March 21 deadline imposed by Congress.
Later, on Sunday, March 2nd, Rollins made an announcement offering hope to some farmers, with few details. in Press StatementThe USDA said the IRA fund’s institutional review will be completed and funds related to EQIP, CSP and ACEP will be released, but did not clarify how much it will be frozen. The statement also announced its commitment to distribute $20 billion in additional disaster assistance.
Lavender called Rollins’ statement “no boundaries” because of the degree of “ambiguity.” If Rollins mentions the first funding tranches, or if the statement announces a second tranches, he went on. “Uncertainty still seems to be the best governance. We need to be more clear.”
The USDA did not respond to Grist’s request for explanation.
Farmers who identify with women, queer or people of color are particularly uneasy about the circumstances of the contract. Beekeeper Roell said the funding application praised the business’s diverse workforce development program. Currently using them/their pronouns, Roell fears that existing contracts and pending applications will be targeted for the same reasons. (Federal agencies follow Presidential Order It aims to “end the radical and useless government DEI programme.”
“This feels like a complete attack on sustainable agriculture, small businesses, queer people, BIPOCs and female farmers,” Roel said. “At this point, all of our projects are flagged as DEIs. I don’t know if they are allowed to modify these submissions or if the language of the project is just completely rejected because it is for women and queer people.”
Rebecca Wolf, senior food policy analyst at Food & Water Watch, is deeply interested in the knock-on effect of this fundraising thief on the already broken agricultural economy in America. The tensions of the agricultural recession looming in areas like the Midwest and the number of farms in the US It’s already steadily decreasingshe believes that the freeze on federal employees and continued massive layoffs are “finally on the path to further integration.” Given that the administration is “deliberately demolishing programs that help support small and medium-sized farmers,” Wolf said it could lead to “loss on these farms and loss of land ownership.”
Other results may be more subtle, but not so important. Fundraising freezes, layoffs and hostility to climate action in the Trump administration could be making even more contributions than the agriculture sector across the nation contributes to carbon emissions, according to Omanjana Goswami, a soil scientist defending a nonprofit coalition of concern scientists.
Agriculture explained 10.6% Of the 2021 US carbon emissions, farmers implement conservation practices on their farms, which could lead to improved air and water quality, and could improve soil capacity to store carbon. Such tactics are encouraged by many of the programs currently under review, as well as reducing agricultural emissions. “If you look at the scale of this, it’s huge,” Goswami said. “If this funding is reduced or removed entirely, it means that the impact and contribution of agriculture on climate change will increase.”
The US Forest Service shooting destroys an already under-staffed agency: “It’s devastating.”
The Trump administration’s attacks on farmers come when the agriculture industry faces multiple existential crises. One is close to farmers. In 2023, the median household income from agriculture was minus $900. This means that at least half of all households that earned income from agriculture did not make a profit.
Additionally, in 2023, a natural disaster caused nearly $22 billion in agricultural losses. Rising temperatures slow the growth of plants, frequent floods and droughts destroy harvests, and wildfires burn the fields. Farmers are increasingly paid out of pocket as only a subset of these losses are paid only. Last year, the effects of extreme weather, rising labor and production costs, global supply and imbalances in supply and volatility in prices all resulted in what some economists have designated the industry’s worst fiscal year in nearly 20 years.
The Washington-based business kitchen sync strategy helps smallholder farmers provide fresh food to institutions like schools, Elliot Smith says the situation has completely changed the way the federal government is viewed. Freeze has said that this experience has led to its view federal funding as “unstable” as it hampers major grants for farmers and food businesses working in at least 10 different states, suspending new contracts and slates for ongoing projects.
Freezes not only threatens the future of Smith’s business, but also the future of farmers and the local food systems they work across the country. “The whole food ecosystem is properly fixed. The USDA feels like a troll that saw the sun. They’re frozen. They can’t move,” he said. “The rest of us are in the fields and in the trench. We look back at the government and say, ‘Where are you?’ ”
