In July 2024, Gateway critics reported on the epic victory in Colorado federal court over the conglomerate of a non-governmental “citizenship” organization that produced lawsuits against three grassroots citizens. in CO, MT, WY STATE AREA Conference of the NAACP v Shawn Smith et al. Defendants Ash Epp, Holly Kasun and Sean Smith defeated the Missippi My Familia Rata and the Federation of Women Voters in an overwhelmingly directed ruling from Biden’s appointees and first woman, Judge Charlotte Sweeney, in the West West of Mississippi.
The directed verdict means that once the plaintiffs rest their case, the judge has decided that their case and defense discussion is insufficient and that they cannot beat the merits of the case.
117
Three “get the vote” NGOs have appealed to us to stop us from canvasing to confirm the government’s work on turnout.Hey, why do NGOs dive by perjury to stop us from canvasing? https://t.co/h4ovuo13mp
-Ash of America (@asheinamerica) April 6, 2025
The lawsuit covers unofficial group UseIP, and has decided to use voters from various counties as canvases to ask questions about the 2020 presidential election, including how they voted and whether people identified in the official voting role actually lived at addresses. This result showed conservatively a contradiction of 8% between what was reported and that they could have been canvas.
This case was made for Primety Time TV. It included compiled documents from the Colorado Secretary’s Office. This actually covers the evidence of experpulpy and was discovered only by the freedom to request information from another government agency to email. It included the “racist resonance” of calling the KKK Act against defendants. And what kind of crime drama would be complete without a “breathing” moment from the witness? The plaintiff had that moment in the trial. Only non-party witness She testified that she had no idea who the accused was and was instructed by a lawyer to identify the accused as those who could have her home.
David vs. Goliath – NAACP faction will face grassroots canbusters in the case of elections
Following the frivolous trial, Colonel Kasun, Epp, and Smith decided to file an appeal challenge to a lower court’s ruling that refuses to compensate for legal costs.
According to a press release from the plaintiff, the defendant allegedly “visiting, arming, intimidating, threatening and targeting minority voters.” However, as mentioned earlier, their only non-party witnesses “confessors’ attorneys have admitted in their position that the state defendant has urged her to threaten her with an affidavit.
Under the 1978 US Supreme Court decision Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Committee, The court ruled that the defendant involved in a case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 could only recover his attorney’s fees if the plaintiff’s claims were frivolous, unreasonable or unfounded.
These three fight to level the playing field for civil rights cases while the left-wing NGO machines spun cases rapidly.
NGOs currently have no downside to bringing them along. Most defendants are under pressure to settle their lawsuits rather than face the financial burden of fighting their claims. By supporting this appeal and helping to overturn this abusive precedent, we will help change it. visit here To help them in this fight. Every penny that grew up is headed for a lawyer in the fight. 7-0 against Mark Elias and “Machine”.
From a press release on appeal:
Christiansburg standards are a decades-old legal precedent like us, and the general defendant is prohibited from recovering legal costs from plaintiffs. Here, here, Three Funded NGOs-Unless the case is considered “frivolous.” A general defendant must insist and overturn this standard is an unfair shield and that it allows NGOs to unleash the law without consequences.
The outrageous thing about the case exposes systemic abuse. NGOs are often bankrolled through USAID by donations and taxpayer dollars, and use lawsuits to not only promote the agenda, but also generate and raise the media. According to NYU review of law and social change article That was admitted in evidence. This article explains the benefits of recovering damages through KKK law and the added benefit of reporting that defendants can be painted “in relation to the stigma of conspiracy and the legacy of political racism in the KKK.”
As recent revelation shows, public anger is rising rapidly Millions of USAID funds flowing to NGOs are simply turning and suing Americans thanks to Christiansburg. The appeal seeks to level the legal playing field and requires plaintiffs’ NGOs to face the same financial accountability they had when they lost.
The urgency cannot be denied. With USAID funding cuts, NGOs are rushing for new revenue streams. LawFare is clearly important, considering citizens and organizations for the media seeking donations. If Christiansburg is standing, this “financement” tactic only escalates, threatening countless defendants with unidentified, riskless lawsuits.
Winn and Ernie PLLC, representing Gregor’s Smith, Kasun and Epp, are Michael J. Wynn and Cameron Powell. and Amazing 7-0 victory record against Mark Elias, Plaintiffs are confident in their appeal.
You can donate to support this important case. diveendgo.com/stopngolawfare
