Stardust’s future client Looks like a government: With the country taking into consideration geography engineering, Stardust could be poised to sell them to achieve those goals, several experts said. In an emailed response to questions about its business model, Yedvab explained its approach as “based on the premise” that solargeo engineering will “play an important role in dealing with global warming in the coming decades.”
The company’s technology portfolio can be “developed according to decisions made by the US government and the international community,” Yedvab added.
The company is about to patent its geoengineering technology. “We expect it to be US-led [geoengineering] Yedvab said: Pasztor’s report shows advances in research and development programs, and the value of Stardust’s technology portfolio grows accordingly.
The outlook for a unique, personalized geography engineering technology is worrying some experts. Pasztor recommends Stardust work with investors to explore ways to provide intellectual property so that other manufacturers can freely use patented three-point seat belt designs 60 years ago. Alternatively, Stardust can work with the government to purchase the full IP rights, purchase the full IP rights, and make the technology freely available.
In any case, Pasztor argues that Stardust can only proceed ethically if it does so with full transparency and independent surveillance.
Other experts have questioned Stardust’s actions so far. Shuchi Talati, founder of Just Deliberation at Solar Geoengineering, a Washington, DC-based nonprofit, said he “doesn’t stick to any of them” when it comes to governance principles such as transparency and public engagement. “Pasztor’s report is the only public thing we know about them,” she added. Stardust has not conducted public consultations for outdoor field testing and has not made any public data or other information about them, Talati said. And she argued that lack of transparency could affect the company, as Stardust’s approach could trigger conspiracy theories about what the “secret Israeli company” is doing.
A better approach, Tarati advocated in a Paper published in JanuaryStardust communicates, builds trust as quickly as possible, revealing what it is doing and who is attractive. She argued that the company’s funders should disclose the scope of the work they are funding.
People of Earth’s friends have long been making the “geo-engineering”A dangerous distractionTake further the concerns of Echo Tarati and the criticism of Stardust. “I don’t think raising venture capital funds and committing to scientific ideals is compatible,” said Benjamin Day, a senior campaigner on enemy geography engineering.
If the government chooses to use geography engineering, it could rely heavily on Stardust if it is ahead of the competition. “There is no private market for geographical engineering technology. You only make money if deployed by the government. At that point, they are trying to take the government hostage with technology patents.”
