A study from Binghamton University shows that disadvantaged environments may slow down child reward processing and increase the risk of future depression
Growing up in a neighborhood characterized by crime rates, financial difficulties and limited resources doesn’t just have an impact beyond the daily experiences of a child, according to a groundbreaking study from Binghamton University. Research published in Research on psychopathology in children and adolescentsrevealing that children in underprivileged areas exhibit reduced neural responses when they win or lose, but only if they already have a family history of depression.
This finding provides critical insight into how environmental factors beyond the child’s immediate family increase vulnerability to mental health challenges, especially for those who are already genetically suffering from depression.
Beyond personal experience: how your neighborhood shapes a young mind
Previous research focuses on individual stressors such as personal trauma, but this study expands understanding by examining how community-level factors affect the developed brain. The research team, led by Professor Brandon Gibb and graduate student Elana Israel and former graduate students, are specifically targeting how neighbourhood conditions affect neural reward processing. This is an important factor in the risk of depression.
“One of my interests is how neural reward processing is related to the risk of depression. One thing we know is exposure to stress,” Israel said. “Previous studies focus on stress at the individual level. Fewer studies have looked at community-level stressors reporting on trauma and interpersonal stress experienced.”
Measurement of neighborhood effects on children’s brains
The research team studied over 200 children aged 7 to 11 and first determined whether their parents had a history of major depressive disorder. Zip code data was used to assess each child’s neighborhood environment, including crime risk, socioeconomic disadvantage, and community resources.
While the children completed a simple financial inference task, researchers used EEG to measure brain activity. This allowed the team to observe neural responses when children gained or lost money during the task.
Important findings from the study:
- Children in disadvantaged areas showed a dull brain response to both reward and loss
- This effect was most powerful in children whose parents had a history of depression.
- Children with no history of family members with depression showed less impact from neighbours
- This study used multiple measures of neighborhood quality, including local deprivation index, neighborhood crime risk, and child opportunity index.
This pattern suggests that growing up in chronically stressful environments can lead children to develop wet emotional response systems. Especially those who are already at genetic risk for depression.
Adaptation to chronic stress: When emotional musts become a problem
“When something good or bad happens to you, your brain reacts and we can measure that brain activity,” Gibb said. “And how you tend to react to something good or bad can increase your risk of something like depression, which means it’s not just what’s happening to you personally, but the context in which you live.
Researchers suggest that this slowed response could represent adaptation to life in a chronically stressful environment. As children grow up surrounded by unpredictability and threats, their brains may learn to not respond too strongly to positive or negative events.
“When you’re chronically stressed, whether it’s good or bad, it can undermine your reaction to something,” Gibb said. “We want to be reactive when good things are happening to our kids. You should be excited. That’s what motivates you to do things and do them. That’s what we think is happening.”
However, what begins as an adaptive response can lead to reduced motivation and enjoyment of positive experiences, which are characteristic of depression.
Impact on community mental health
This study has implications far beyond individual mental health treatments. It suggests that addressing neighborhood-level factors should be part of a comprehensive approach to supporting children’s psychological development.
“Just being in these contexts can affect mental health, and these neighborhood characteristics can affect children, even if they are not directly touched. So it has broader implications, and there are more reasons why we need to try to improve our community,” GIBB emphasized.
Looking ahead, the researchers launched a follow-up study to investigate what happens to a child’s neural response when families move to new areas. They also plan to investigate whether similar effects occur in social outcomes such as peer acceptance and rejection, and whether patterns persist in adolescence.
This study highlights the importance of community-level intervention along with individual treatment in promoting psychological resilience, along with growing evidence that mental health is shaped not only by genetics and the context of the near-kind environment, but also by the broader community contexts in which children develop.
If our report notifies you or inspires you, please consider making a donation. All contributions can continue to provide accurate, engaging and reliable science and medical news, regardless of size. Independent journalism requires time, effort and resources. With your support we can continue to uncover the stories that matter most to you.
Join to make your knowledge accessible and shocking. Thank you for standing with us!